In the “Science or Fiction” segment of the (then) latest Skeptics Guide to the Universe podcast (where host Steven Novella serves up one fake and two real news segment(s) for his panel of skeptics – or “rogues” – to figure out), the one that turned out to be fiction involved the recent approval of a genetically modified potato designed to contain up to 40% less calories than conventional potatoes. One of the rogue’s reasoning as to why this must be fake is that there is so much research going into making foods that are more calorifically dense (think Plumpy’nut, or peanut butter “amplified”) to treat malnutrition that it would make little sense for scientists to be working on something to contain less calories than necessary.
- The Good Old Days with Keith Floyd
- Withnail and I Dinner Menu
- Food addiction, and why words matter
- On love and madness in Swaziland
- The problem with food porn
- When food porn got boring
- “Cultural Appropriation” Nonsense
- Is (watching) a post-mortem about fat-shaming?
- Postcard(s) from Chicago
- What is expertise?
- dear PRUDENCE on This is what a cherry looks like: huh? i’ve been on the prudent diet all my life.. i weigh...
- Jacqs on Birds, bees, and fennel ice cream: Evil, mouth watering stuff, but thank you for a delightful read.
- Christiaan Olivier (@ChristiaanOli5) on Surprise: people don’t eat what they’re told!: They are not...
- concerned on Surprise: people don’t eat what they’re told!: EXACTLY- Great piece. This is exactly why I...
- Jacques Rousseau on Surprise: people don’t eat what they’re told!: Also, look at the things they...
- Come cherry pick with me
- New foodspeak: greatest (or worst) hits
- 1 down, 51 to go
- Not with a bang but a pop
- No, Coca Cola. You may not comment on obesity.
- No, actually don’t try this at home
- To kill an eel
- Country eating..and eating…and still eating
- There’s more to life than rumballs
- On (inevitable) repetition